Flow with this for a while, I am going to a wierd place, but I am not staying there. Reserve your crys of “heretic!”, Reserve your judgement, until the end.
Sigmund Freud is often vilified in evangelical circles. This is not a defense of Freud, I intend to make an example of his work here. I maintain that the man was on a legitimate search for truth and failed miserbly, oh so close to his destination.
Examine the Holy Trinity and the 3 components of personality set forth by Freud:
Father: Creator
Son: Redeemer, required because of the Law.
Holy Spirit: Comforts us and helps us make Godly decisions.
Id: Requires immediate gratification without concern for external forces. When I was taught this in Psysh 101, they said, “One brother wants to hit another with a hammer, so he DOES.” And that’s the id. The id is entirely in the subconscious, unseen and unknown. The id KIND OF looks like both a totally depraved person, and at the same time a HOLY God.
Ego: According to wikipedia, “the ego mediates between the id, the super-ego and the external world.” Really? A Mediator? Interesting…my psych 101 illustration was “One brother does NOT hit another with a hammer even though he wants to, because if he does, he is disciplined for it.” Now we have a concept of justice and penitence.
SuperEgo: Again from wikipedia: “The super-ego is a symbolic internalization of the father figure and cultural regulations. The super-ego tends to stand in opposition to the desires of the id because of their conflicting objectives, and is aggressive towards the ego. The super-ego acts as the conscience, maintaining our sense of morality and the prohibition of taboos.” My psych 101 defintion: “One brother does not hit the other one with a hammer because he has learned right from wrong, and knows that this is WRONG.” Huh…sounds a lot like the Holy Spirit’s work in our lives, doesn’t it?
Now.. PUT AWAY YOUR TORCHES! My point here is NOT to say that Freud has an alternate truth on the Trinity. As much as reading this may tempt you to think that.
I think that, like a LOT of very smart, lost people, Freud was on a search. The result of his search was classical psychology. He got SO CLOSE to the truth that perhaps without realizing it, wound up with a fractured description of the Holy Trinity.
He didn’t nail the truth, that much should be obvious at least to any evangelical. But I claim that he skirted close to it. Imagine if his search had been accompanied by the welcome advice of an evangelical friend.
I love seeing people on a spiritual journey, searching for truth. I see these theological “near misses” like this all around me. They remind me that people are on a spiritual journey, but a lot them embark without a Shirpa. Wandering the landscape they come up with some CRAZY ideas.
As Christians, we’ve got the “X” that marks the spot, it’s called the Cross.